There does not seem to be much in common between the risk a gambler takes to get rich and the ‘disasters’ caused by certain industrial accidents, which are at the heart of INERIS's field of expertise. However, the concept of risk is cross-cutting, which makes it difficult to grasp: it applies to all aspects of life, in both the private and public spheres.
One of the first analyses of the growing importance of this concept in our contemporary culture was conducted by German sociologist Ulrich Beck in a book published in 1986, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.
Beck's theory is based on the observation of a ‘rupture within modernity’, manifested by the questioning of the ‘religion of progress’. The notion of progress that has underpinned the development of industrial societies since the 19th century is still considered to be a source of wealth. But it is now also seen as a source of threats, dangers and risks to health and safety, which U. Beck identifies as the components of the concept of ‘risk’. The predominant issue of ‘wealth distribution’ is giving way to the issue of ‘risk management’. This is becoming central to modern societies, which are witnessing a loss of confidence in science and technology, insofar as risks are not considered to be under control.
And today... what place do risks occupy in society?
Risk, disaster, threat, vulnerability, resilience... Beck's seminal analysis has since been refined and expanded: the risk society is also a society of risk assessment, where ‘risk science’, i.e. scientific knowledge about risks, has been developed and professionalised to support public decision-making in debates about societal choices where knowledge is lacking.
The Covid-19 pandemic has marked the entry of industrial societies into an era of widespread instability that is accelerating this apparent paradox. On the one hand, a deep crisis of confidence in institutions and in the knowledge on which they are based is combined with the emergence of a ‘post-truth’ regime fuelled by the ‘digital information society’ and social media. The notion of ‘post-truth’ reflects a tendency to relegate scientific facts and their interpretation, previously regarded as the bearers of recognised ‘truth’, to the status of opinions among others. On the other hand, the ecological emergency, the acceleration of global warming and the succession of health crises are keeping risk science at the heart of societal debates.